Comments on: SEO test http://gdymov.com/seotest/ Tools, hacks & misc Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:52:56 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3 by: joe http://gdymov.com/seotest/#comment-3678 Mon, 22 Jan 2007 05:33:27 +0000 http://gdymov.com/seotest/#comment-3678 I agree with this, about recips are ok as long as they are only a small part of the links that go to your site I agree with this, about recips are ok as long as they are only a small part of the links that go to your site

]]> by: ChrisM http://gdymov.com/seotest/#comment-1194 Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:39:42 +0000 http://gdymov.com/seotest/#comment-1194 Sorry if I've missed something obvious here, but are you talking about any specific search engine? If not, wouldn't different companies & therefor different policies weigh reciprocals to one way links differently ? Hoping for clarification, not trying to be a smart arse :) Sorry if I’ve missed something obvious here, but are you talking about any specific search engine? If not, wouldn’t different companies & therefor different policies weigh reciprocals to one way links differently ?
Hoping for clarification, not trying to be a smart arse :)

]]> by: Ben http://gdymov.com/seotest/#comment-1133 Sun, 12 Nov 2006 19:30:48 +0000 http://gdymov.com/seotest/#comment-1133 I thought one-way links were counted much higher -- but only if they are relevant. Isn't that the point of Semantic Indexing? I thought one-way links were counted much higher — but only if they are relevant. Isn’t that the point of Semantic Indexing?

]]> by:   Чужие SEO эксперименты - Домашняя страница SEO http://gdymov.com/seotest/#comment-636 Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:11:09 +0000 http://gdymov.com/seotest/#comment-636 [...] И на прощание еще пара чужих тестов http://gdymov.com/seotest/ http://seotest.rbscorp.ru/   Оригинал статьи на:   Зачем Google выкатил новый поисковик? ← → [...] […] И на прощание еще пара чужих тестов http://gdymov.com/seotest/ http://seotest.rbscorp.ru/   Оригинал статьи на:   Зачем Google выкатил новый поисковик? ← → […]

]]> by: gdymov http://gdymov.com/seotest/#comment-46 Sun, 30 Apr 2006 13:42:48 +0000 http://gdymov.com/seotest/#comment-46 Yeah, Im also more and more convinced that recips are ok as long as they are only a small part of the links that go to your site. But sites with LOTS of recips have clearly lost ranking. Yeah, Im also more and more convinced that recips are ok as long as they are only a small part of the links that go to your site. But sites with LOTS of recips have clearly lost ranking.

]]> by: Jim Westergren http://gdymov.com/seotest/#comment-45 Sun, 30 Apr 2006 13:37:28 +0000 http://gdymov.com/seotest/#comment-45 ipip is #1 because it gets the most juice. It gets 2 links to it as well as sitip but etsit has more power and thus gives more to ipip than orip gives to sitip. I belive reciprocals are the same or slightly the same good as normal links IF NOT USED IN EXCESS. ipip is #1 because it gets the most juice.

It gets 2 links to it as well as sitip but etsit has more power and thus gives more to ipip than orip gives to sitip.

I belive reciprocals are the same or slightly the same good as normal links IF NOT USED IN EXCESS.

]]> by: private road construction http://gdymov.com/seotest/#comment-13 Mon, 27 Mar 2006 01:44:02 +0000 http://gdymov.com/seotest/#comment-13 Reciprocal links I believe are just as good as one way links. Best Reciprocal links I believe are just as good as one way links.

Best

]]>