<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google destroys the semantic web</title>
	<link>http://gdymov.com/google-destroys-the-semantic-web/</link>
	<description>Tools, hacks &#038; misc</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jim Westergren</title>
		<link>http://gdymov.com/google-destroys-the-semantic-web/#comment-44</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 13:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gdymov.com/google-destroys-the-semantic-web/#comment-44</guid>
					<description>&quot;The act of Google trying to 'understand' the web caused the web itself to change.&quot; - Jeremy Zawodny

You are right but I don't think the nofollow will &quot;destroy the semantic web&quot;. How many webmasters even know about that tag? 1% perhaps.

Here is an interesting thread about Google starting to use traffic patterns:
http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum30/33769.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The act of Google trying to &#8216;understand&#8217; the web caused the web itself to change.&#8221; - Jeremy Zawodny</p>
<p>You are right but I don&#8217;t think the nofollow will &#8220;destroy the semantic web&#8221;. How many webmasters even know about that tag? 1% perhaps.</p>
<p>Here is an interesting thread about Google starting to use traffic patterns:<br />
<a href='http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum30/33769.htm' rel='nofollow'>http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum30/33769.htm</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Damian Yerrick</title>
		<link>http://gdymov.com/google-destroys-the-semantic-web/#comment-34</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 02:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gdymov.com/google-destroys-the-semantic-web/#comment-34</guid>
					<description>The trick to keeping your name high on Google without doing shady nofollow tricks is to come up with a unique name that gets fewer than 100 hits before you publish your site and then spread your site by word of e-mouth. Then other people will start searching for that name, and you'll rank decent because nobody else is using that name for anything. Barring that, you have to think of a juxtaposition of concepts that nobody else is thinking of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trick to keeping your name high on Google without doing shady nofollow tricks is to come up with a unique name that gets fewer than 100 hits before you publish your site and then spread your site by word of e-mouth. Then other people will start searching for that name, and you&#8217;ll rank decent because nobody else is using that name for anything. Barring that, you have to think of a juxtaposition of concepts that nobody else is thinking of.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marcus Westberg</title>
		<link>http://gdymov.com/google-destroys-the-semantic-web/#comment-33</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 06:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gdymov.com/google-destroys-the-semantic-web/#comment-33</guid>
					<description>This is so true! 
To bad we all are using these techinques ourselfs, actually we are forced to do it since others would have the edge if we didn´t.... sad but true.

&lt;strong&gt;Answer:&lt;/strong&gt; Yeah Marcus, the competition forces everybody to find and employ the most sophisticated methods to improve rankings. But as it is now, I don't think this will end up very well. When too many people use SEO, the quality of the organic results will drop even more than it has done so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so true!<br />
To bad we all are using these techinques ourselfs, actually we are forced to do it since others would have the edge if we didn´t&#8230;. sad but true.</p>
<p><strong>Answer:</strong> Yeah Marcus, the competition forces everybody to find and employ the most sophisticated methods to improve rankings. But as it is now, I don&#8217;t think this will end up very well. When too many people use SEO, the quality of the organic results will drop even more than it has done so far.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
